Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-G7
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 18:19
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 146
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 608
54% 455 Pts
64-Core 1,181
73% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 60.5
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 61.7
49% 63.8 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 55.3
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Timetec 35TTM8SSATA-1TB 1TB
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 396 399 405 409 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 486
Write 394
Mixed 246
SusWrite 404
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 22.8
109% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 46.3
88% 172 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 194 194 191 194 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 190
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 194
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback