| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GL63 9RDS |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-16P5 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190520 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 23 '23 at 12:28 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 69% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
62.2%
Good
|
64% 108 Pts
|
38% 312 Pts
|
27% 431 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.23
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.7%
Poor
|
24% 30.5 fps
|
24% 30 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1387 1347 941 942 957 956 MB/s
|
179%
Outstanding
|
261% 1,151 MB/s
|
165% 53.9 MB/s
|
381% 522 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
78.6%
Very good
|
83% 28.9 GB/s
|
58% 20.3 GB/s
|
51% 78.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,641 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples | 1,506x |
| Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples | 96x |
| Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 718x |
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 706x |
| GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples | 200x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |