| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GL63 9RDS |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-16P5 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190520 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 22 '23 at 15:42 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
74.8%
Very good
|
77% 135 Pts
|
52% 413 Pts
|
25% 408 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.23
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.6%
Poor
|
23% 29.5 fps
|
24% 29.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1701 1362 954 990 1008 984 MB/s
|
195%
Outstanding
|
257% 1,129 MB/s
|
199% 64.6 MB/s
|
489% 655 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
83% 29 GB/s
|
70% 24.6 GB/s
|
56% 71.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,642 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples | 1,507x |
| Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples | 96x |
| Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 718x |
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 707x |
| GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples | 200x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |