| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Huananzhi X79-4M (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190317 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 23 '23 at 11:05 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
70.2%
Very good
|
65% 109 Pts
|
51% 425 Pts
|
48% 773 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
29% 37.7 fps
|
27% 34.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 79 76 84 79 MB/s
|
46.1%
Average
|
51% 70 MB/s
|
104% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
116GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 88 87 88 MB/s
|
54.6%
Above average
|
69% 93.5 MB/s
|
166% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.9%
Poor
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
20% 6.87 GB/s
|
54% 74 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79-4M Builds (Compare 23 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-4M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2670Intel $53Bench 67%, 4,803 samples | 3x |
| Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 2x |
| Xeon E5-2630 v2IntelBench 67%, 1,838 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $150 |