Lenovo 4282CS5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemLenovo 4282CS5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4282CS5
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 02:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 65
2-Core 118
51% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 276
34% 262 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA004R22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 365 394 129 168 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 424
Write 394
Mixed 356
SusWrite 247
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 31.3
107% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 220
172% 234 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4282CS5 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4282CS5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback