DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory4.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090728
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateNov 18 '17 at 04:34
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 131
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 283
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
Sapphire(174B E140) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 25.1
22% 22.3 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 21
Splatting 19
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
378GB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 127
Write 134
Mixed 97.9
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.43
106% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 50.7
Mixed 58.1
42% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.36
86% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 69%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
3TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 36
Write 30.6
Mixed 32
42% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.28
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 4096, 4096, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback