CMS 7200-5731B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCMS 7200-5731B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H410M-K
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210222
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 17:02
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 600
62% 502 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 51.8
46% 55.9 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 52.8
45% 55.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 445
Write 239
Mixed 267
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 1.3
44% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 48.3
DQ Mixed 42.1
41% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
526GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 154 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 152
Mixed 103
SusWrite 154
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 24.4
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 24.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5731B Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: CMS 7200-5731B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $129
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback