User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF-Q
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 14:35
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 177
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 703
61% 522 Pts
64-Core 1,389
86% 1,389 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Zotac(19DA 6527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.1% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 125
Parallax 108
92% 115 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 93.2
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,582
Write 1,046
Mixed 923
262% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 26.2
172% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 340
298% 436 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 232%
V-gen06sm21ar128sdknv 128GB 128GB
16GB free
Firmware: T0901A3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,407
Write 981
Mixed 994
250% 1,127 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 40
207% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 507
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 427
364% 528 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 208%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
5GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.6
Write 1.2
Mixed 4.2
8% 9.33 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
93% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6MFR8C-PB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 31.5
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 18.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback