Asrock H61M-VG3

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-VG3 (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121025
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '23 at 09:35
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3210-$70 7,331 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 69 2-Core 130 57% 93.3 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 174 23% 171 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.5% Average	Lighting 58.7 Reflection 54.1 Parallax 74.6 48% 62.5 fps	MRender 56.6 Gravity 59.2 Splatting 38.8 41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227P SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 121 155 201 220 221 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.7% Average	Read 218 Write 203 Mixed 186 SusWrite 166 44% 193 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 9 67% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 12.8 42% 90.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 861GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 161 171 181 177 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 171 Mixed 37.6 SusWrite 172 102% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QUM3U-8G1600C11R 1x8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.1% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55

CPU
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	107x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	93x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	91x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	209x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	63x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	75x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	34x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	23x
CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston 99U5474-025.A00LF 6GBUnknownBench 37%, 26 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $83

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16