MSI MS-16J2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star PE60 2QE
MotherboardMSI MS-16J2  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150923
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateJan 21 '23 at 15:29
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 99.8
43% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 198
22% 174 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
MSI(1462 1138) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 18
Parallax 4.8
3% 8.8 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 4.1
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900NS38 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 85 93 64 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 278
Write 117
Mixed 170
SusWrite 81.4
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 22.8
78% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 93.5
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 102
79% 106 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 71%
WDC WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 512GB
299GB free
Firmware: SN08979
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 399 389 420 429 429 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 372
Write 411
Mixed 392
SusWrite 410
90% 396 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 19.8
73% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 256
183% 231 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
302GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 8,735
Mixed 60.4
3,145% 4,398 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 9905428-435.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J2 Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback