Acer Aspire E5-575

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 03:47
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 137
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 208
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 6
5% 5.6 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 512GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0824A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 315 358 360 253 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.6% Very good
Read 459
Write 349
Mixed 334
SusWrite 281
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 22.2
96% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 38
71% 137 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR21D4S15HAG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 22
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575 Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback