Supermicro X9DR3-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DR3-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DR3-F
Memory249.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '23 at 12:40
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 58
2-Core 146
56% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 528
48% 402 Pts
64-Core 1775
110% 1775 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.3
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 68 84 137 137 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
47% Average
Read 415
Write 342
Mixed 178
SusWrite 126
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 13.9
62% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 36.2
42% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47%
Great: 54%
LSI MR9261-8i 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 186 187 186 181 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 20%
LSI MR9261-8i 18TB
17TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1052 1023 1030 1006 985 1030 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 40.9
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DR3-F Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X9DR3-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback