Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '23 at 10:40
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 119 2-Core 243 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 754 73% 603 Pts	64-Core 1,197 74% 1,197 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 44.1 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 39.4 36% 41.8 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 42.9 Splatting 28.2 29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-000L1 256GB 1,116 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT4200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 229 237 241 235 62 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 494 Write 256 Mixed 193 SusWrite 208 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 31.2 135% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 78.5 121% 233 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 85%
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 55GB free Firmware: S9FM02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 82 85 81 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 372 Write 99.2 Mixed 170 SusWrite 84.9 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 23.4 110% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 10.8 36% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 91%
INTENSO 256GB 4,055 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 172GB free Firmware: S8FM08.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 351 350 353 351 353 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 496 Write 357 Mixed 256 SusWrite 349 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 23 97% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 74.5 86% 145 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 100%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 177GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 970 591 312 314 313 312 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,415 Write 1,167 Mixed 562 SusWrite 469 201% 903 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 48.7 177% 63.9 MB/s	DQ Read 979 DQ Write 718 DQ Mixed 646 537% 781 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 149GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 942 638 631 592 600 599 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	269% Outstanding	Read 2,522 Write 2,333 Mixed 1521 SusWrite 667 393% 1,761 MB/s	4K Read 64.4 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 82.8 282% 98.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,024 DQ Write 781 DQ Mixed 873 661% 893 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 269% Great: 340%
Intenso Speed Line 126GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 117GB free, PID 0903 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 47 47 47 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 83.8 Write 45.1 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 45.8 63% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD F4-3000C16-8GISB BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD F4-3000C16-8GISB 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.9% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 24.8 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 25.1 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,409x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	541x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	321x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	229x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16