Asus PRIME X399-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 198%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X399-A  (all builds)
Memory117.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210715
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 21:18
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 927
83% 699 Pts
64-Core 4,190
259% 4,190 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 211
Parallax 243
163% 218 fps
MRender 269
Gravity 219
Splatting 169
174% 219 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 153%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
586GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2023 2059 2021 1781 1782 1774 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,267
Write 2,252
Mixed 2,137
SusWrite 1,907
482% 2,140 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 59.8
191% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 415
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 369
273% 361 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 283%
Great: 469%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
510GB free
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1526 1123 1009 1032 1044 1155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,694
Write 2,222
Mixed 1,734
SusWrite 1,148
384% 1,700 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 46
147% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 384
286% 380 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 201%
Great: 333%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
557GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 106
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 111
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
812GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 97 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 87.6
Write 97.5
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 97.2
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53%
Great: 57%
WD My Book 640GB
320GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 36.2
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 35.6
46% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 28.2
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 29
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X399-A Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X399-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback