HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '23 at 18:29
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$73 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 138 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 187 25% 185 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.8% Average	Lighting 61.1 Reflection 69.9 Parallax 63.2 50% 64.7 fps	MRender 68.1 Gravity 62.3 Splatting 55 50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 224 215 205 219 210 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.9% Above average	Read 266 Write 228 Mixed 230 SusWrite 210 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 26.8 92% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 34.2 DQ Write 96.4 DQ Mixed 40.1 38% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 91%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 79GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 58 53 56 56 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 51.7 Write 46 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 54.6 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 57%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 31GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 58 53 56 56 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 72.7 Write 45 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 54.6 41% 54.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 24GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	622x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	161x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	109x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	102x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	72x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	26x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359