Standard Standard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemStandard Standard  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GM7MPHP
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 10:45
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 109
54% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 433
41% 339 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1096) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1289
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 8.9
2% 6.33 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 8.6
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,870
Write 1,548
Mixed 1,096
334% 1,504 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 60.9
200% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 656
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 550
409% 547 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
129GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1863 966 818 823 823 825 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,129
Write 1,489
Mixed 1,230
SusWrite 1,020
327% 1,467 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 68.5
216% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 449
DQ Mixed 579
428% 570 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 240%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.8% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Standard Standard

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback