Standard Standard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemStandard Standard  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GM7MPHP
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 10:40
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 130
48% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 406
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1096) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1289
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 7.2
2% 6.6 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 8.7
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,924
Write 1,773
Mixed 1,044
351% 1,580 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 57.7
191% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 570
416% 547 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
129GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1712 1043 820 821 822 819 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,875
Write 1,736
Mixed 1,296
SusWrite 1,006
331% 1,478 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 64
211% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 671
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 589
434% 574 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 227%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 21.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Standard Standard

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback