Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 10:04
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 39.1
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 178
50% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 306
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 35.8
27% 37.5 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 22.4
26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme V-GEN03MA22SCY12 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220303a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 626 474 179 180 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,145
Write 614
Mixed 708
SusWrite 355
156% 705 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 37.1
121% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 315
248% 335 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 120%
Great: 166%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
736GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 132 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 54
SusWrite 129
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.4
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,976 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback