Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '23 at 19:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 39
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 183
54% 103 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 316
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2802
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 36.2
25% 33.1 fps
MRender 41.9
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 23.1
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme V-GEN03MA22SCY12 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220303a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 567 606 444 177 180 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 852
Write 546
Mixed 670
SusWrite 359
136% 607 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 34.5
116% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 315
246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 166%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
744GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 132 130 130 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 52
SusWrite 129
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
123% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 3.9
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback