Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 65.4 2-Core 87.5 49% 75.5 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 232 24% 196 Pts	64-Core 256 16% 256 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0504) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM01.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 236 246 244 219 202 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 320GB-$89 9,811 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 297GB free Firmware: GHBZB550 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 102 103 102 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 102 59% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	303x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	45x
HD Graphics P3000IntelBench 2%, 18 samples	2x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	9x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	9x
SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GBCorsairBench 28%, 203 samples	9x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $81

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16