Asus PRIME H510M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H510M-A  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '23 at 14:38
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$234
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 167
2-Core 325
100% 190 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,057
102% 837 Pts
64-Core 1,612
100% 1,612 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 49.5
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 49.2
40% 52.3 fps
MRender 48.5
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 55.4
43% 51.7 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH960HAJR-000MV 960GB
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXT71M3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 474 481 486 486 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 484
Mixed 431
SusWrite 481
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 50.2
177% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 340
254% 339 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.M8FB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 31.4
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 26.1
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H510M-A Builds (Compare 3,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H510M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback