Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '23 at 00:04
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$60 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 202 66% 121 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 273 42% 303 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.1% Above average	Lighting 68.1 Reflection 64.1 Parallax 70.4 56% 67.5 fps	MRender 64.5 Gravity 68 Splatting 66.3 54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 60%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.13% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 4 Parallax 6.7 5% 5.5 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 9.2 6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.13% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000VX 008-2E3164 2TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 970GB free (System drive) Firmware: CV12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 123 125 115 89 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 99.3 Write 92.6 Mixed 64 SusWrite 114 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-066.A00G 1x16GB 1,752 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	731x
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	483x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	306x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	456x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	398x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	255x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	269x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	132x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	122x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	131x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16