HP ZBook Fury 17.3 Inch G8 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP ZBook Fury 17.3 Inch G8 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 886D
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221017
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 56.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 233
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 688
66% 543 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 886D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 38
Parallax 6.2
4% 16.3 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 5.3
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000H7 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0TEXG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 604 581 609 642 613 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 791
Write 547
Mixed 598
SusWrite 585
141% 630 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 9.8
120% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 37.1
30% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 8.7
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Fury 17.3 Inch G8 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Fury 17.3 Inch G8 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback