Medion H67H2-EM

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Medion H67H2-EM (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H67H2-EM
Memory	7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120208
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '23 at 04:38
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 92.6 2-Core 172 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 414 45% 355 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 46.9 Parallax 34.6 29% 39.1 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 41 Splatting 27.9 28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 149 109 130 125 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 372 Write 161 Mixed 233 SusWrite 125 49% 223 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 36.3 123% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 179 134% 177 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 85%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 265GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 422 440 471 465 341 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 470 Mixed 438 SusWrite 416 103% 456 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 52.9 173% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 365 275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 288GB free Firmware: CC4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 56 57 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 97.9 Write 56.2 Mixed 51.1 SusWrite 56.7 48% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 123% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 3x4GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.3% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	47	10	60	23.5"	1280 720	SAM0C1A S24E390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67H2-EM Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Medion H67H2-EM

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	39x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	3x
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	5x
GeForce GT 545NvidiaBench 6%, 2,995 samples	4x

SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 47%, 228 samples	7x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 550 samples	6x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 49%, 2,386 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359