Acer TravelMate P643-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate P643-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate P643-M
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130424
Uptime33.9 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 19:54
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 111
53% 84.1 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 171
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0681) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAH20105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 319 344 299 308 311 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 297
Write 236
Mixed 322
SusWrite 310
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 17.7
79% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 105
101% 158 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-SD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P643-M Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P643-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback