Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X580GD_N580GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X580GD_N580GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X580GD
Memory4.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180517
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 18:33
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User KGZ-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 41
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 51.4
26% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 81.4
8-Core 127
13% 104 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1FC0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2004
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 2.8
3% 7.37 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 4.1
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 3.9 4 14 18 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 522
Write 6
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 11.8
29% 138 MB/s
4K Read 78.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.6
122% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 278%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
656GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 57 62 101 129 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 137
Write 141
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 95.3
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB16GS2400.C16J Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X580GD_N580GD Builds (Compare 717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X580GD_N580GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback