MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D22
MotherboardMSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 21:21
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 247
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 790
79% 643 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 166
Parallax 111
93% 131 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 100
Splatting 91.4
87% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z44106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 789 729 643 479 654 302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,807
Write 1580
Mixed 1,296
SusWrite 599
295% 1,321 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 66.2
220% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,022
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 372
414% 707 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 216%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AU008G-H3200GNST 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 21.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 25.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22) Builds (Compare 8,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback