MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D22
MotherboardMSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '23 at 08:42
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 105
55% 89 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 99.6
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 99.8
6% 99.8 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.7% Average
Lighting 26
Reflection 77.1
Parallax 9.6
21% 37.6 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 101
Splatting 92.9
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z44106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 890 436 166 335 248 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,409
Write 1,204
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 410
228% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 56.1
181% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 272
202% 271 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 150%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AU008G-H3200GNST 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22) Builds (Compare 8,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback