Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PR
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 19:38
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 155
2-Core 262
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 512
56% 440 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 160C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 30
Parallax 29.5
15% 26 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 21
21% 25.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
631GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 986 934 910 1032 1045 437 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,848
Write 1510
Mixed 1,406
SusWrite 890
316% 1,413 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 76.7
254% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 762
552% 731 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 239%
Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFD832A.M16FRS 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 22.7
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 16.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR Builds (Compare 2,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback