Asrock H310M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H310M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191212
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 17:51
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 795
82% 664 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 4767) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 257
Reflection 217
Parallax 210
210% 228 fps
MRender 218
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
135% 169 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 167%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 323 322 323 324 324 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 478
Mixed 450
SusWrite 334
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 49.8
166% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 325
244% 328 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 28.4
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 27.6
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HDV - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback