Corsair VOYAGER a1600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCorsair VOYAGER a1600  (all builds)
MotherboardCorsair Voyager a1600
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '23 at 23:53
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 166
2-Core 324
97% 186 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 855
88% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1CFA 0004) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.04
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.1% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 42.6
22% 35.1 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 36.2
25% 29.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
849GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,844
Write 1,652
Mixed 1,534
374% 1,676 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 63.1
208% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 730
503% 639 MB/s
Poor: 192% Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM5S8G1M4800A40S2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 34.5
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 22.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VOYAGER a1600 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Corsair VOYAGER a1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback