Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7848
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '23 at 16:54
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 101 2-Core 188 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 512 51% 418 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3161) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.3% Average	Lighting 60.5 Reflection 99.6 Parallax 62.3 49% 74.1 fps	MRender 66.1 Gravity 63 Splatting 54.3 49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB 1,148 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT0101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 101 92 91 83 MB/s Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.2% Average	Read 254 Write 137 Mixed 154 SusWrite 106 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 22.7 91% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 41.6 DQ Mixed 56.7 55% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 61%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB 28,774 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 0GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 95 95 95 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 84.3 Write 85.5 Mixed 58.1 SusWrite 95.6 60% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB 842 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	54.6% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.2 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 16.3 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X5329 F/B620 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 48%, 1,148 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 54%, 842 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16