Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 19:34
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 224
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 567
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0122) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 3102 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 190
Parallax 178
139% 179 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 186
Splatting 129
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 67 62 69 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.9% Average
Read 279
Write 270
Mixed 230
SusWrite 66.4
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 23.3
80% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 89.6
DQ Mixed 39.6
36% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 97%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 301 306 305 305 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 378
Write 309
Mixed 230
SusWrite 303
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 25.9
87% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 42
36% 50.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
285GB free
Firmware: 3.AAJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 67 68 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38% Below average
Read 63.9
Write 68.8
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 68.3
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38%
Great: 43%
Sabrent Disk Device 4TB
14GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.16% Terrible
Read 55.4
Write 20.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 1.6
27% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
36% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.16%
Great: 85%
Sabrent Disk Device 2TB
683GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 53.9
Write 24.8
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 24
38% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
49% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 123%
Sabrent Disk Device 4TB
24GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Read 52.5
Write 22.9
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 1.6
28% 25 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
28% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 18.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback