Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 146
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 432
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.6% Good
Lighting 88.7
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 72.6
72% 82.2 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 74
Splatting 68.1
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 128GB-$88
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 150 157 158 158 112 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.2% Good
Read 240
Write 159
Mixed 149
SusWrite 145
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 34.1
117% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 81.3
84% 136 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 84%
Adata SU 800 1TB
434GB free
Firmware: Q092
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 234 234 234 233 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.9% Good
Read 245
Write 228
Mixed 230
SusWrite 230
53% 233 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 37.5
124% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 118
95% 134 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
606GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 157 158 158 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 130
Write 129
Mixed 100
SusWrite 157
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback