Asrock H310M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H310M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190509
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 02:39
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 662
76% 595 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 197
Parallax 184
14% 133 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 148
Splatting 132
124% 155 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4500104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 129 279 281 289 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 448
Mixed 389
SusWrite 251
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 50.7
163% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 265
216% 309 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 130%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
143GB free
Firmware: S5Z44106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 510 541 548 550 554 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,411
Write 896
Mixed 969
SusWrite 547
213% 956 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 64.5
211% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,051
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 370
403% 686 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 193%
Great: 311%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
23GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 74 87 79 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 64.1
Write 77.2
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 79.6
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
348GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 170 173 177 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 124
Write 75
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 171
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 24.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback