TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z170-HD3P
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '23 at 18:45
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 215
85% 146 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 627
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 87%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Zotac(19DA 2617)
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 190
Parallax 167
137% 175 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 132
Splatting 128
120% 150 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 125%
 Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD10EZEX-08WN4A0 512GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 358 353 394 394 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 452
Write 390
Mixed 290
SusWrite 373
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 33.8
121% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 191
159% 226 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 89.2%
 Great: 99%
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
1.5TB free
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 64 102 114 117 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 427
Write 386
Mixed 108
SusWrite 145
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 8.1
63% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 33
40% 72 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 47.9%
 Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
319GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 152 155 153 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 138
Write 134
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 153
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 83.7%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 27.6
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 28.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 95.9%
 Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z170-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 2,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - $113

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel  $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples819x
Core i5-6600KIntel  $113Bench 72%, 342,244 samples557x
Core i7-6700Intel  $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples304x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples275x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples264x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples242x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples146x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples77x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples56x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples104x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples90x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX  $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples76x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback