Medion Erazer X7851 MD60698

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X7851 MD60698  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670HP6GM
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170223
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 13 '23 at 16:43
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 185
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 480
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 67A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 64.7
51% 67 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 65.8
54% 65.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
104GB free
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 191 172 176 181 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 411
Write 244
Mixed 209
SusWrite 186
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 22
83% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 179
166% 260 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 83%
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
168GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 119 108 110 105 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 445
Write 400
Mixed 205
SusWrite 122
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 26.8
90% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 81.8
122% 230 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 83%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
328GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 295 404 418 384 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 396
Mixed 411
SusWrite 378
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 33.6
108% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 286
225% 314 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST1000LM014-SSHD-8GB 1TB
541GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 21 26 29 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.84% Terrible
Read 6
Write 28.8
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 24.6
13% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 8.84%
Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 95 98 92 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 47.2
Write 114
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 90.2
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.1
108% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 21.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X7851 MD60698 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Medion Erazer X7851 MD60698

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback