MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL62 6QF
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 21:45
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 154
57% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 409
43% 347 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 115A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 5.5
4% 9.3 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 283 281 290 293 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 339
Write 287
Mixed 254
SusWrite 284
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 15
54% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 188
148% 202 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
145GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 8,999
Mixed 75.2
3,245% 4537 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 04CB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback