MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7522
MotherboardMSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110319
Uptime29.3 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 20:07
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 157
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 338
39% 304 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 38.2
25% 33.6 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 33.2
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
207GB free
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 111 114 101 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.3% Below average
Read 210
Write 188
Mixed 178
SusWrite 100
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 11.2
63% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 15.7
22% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 166%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 52 65 64 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 108
Write 117
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 57.2
64% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
41GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 54 52 65 64 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 96.5
Write 99.6
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 57.6
63% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate Backup+ BK 500GB
201GB free, PID a003
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.3 11 11 9.4 9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 18
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 8.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Pro-E (MS-7522) Builds (Compare 866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback