MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '23 at 14:50
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	94%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 Quad-Core 136 User benchmarks, average bench 67% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 185 62% 113 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 303 40% 299 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Gigabyte(1458 405B) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 174 Reflection 165 Parallax 158 142% 166 fps	MRender 185 Gravity 138 Splatting 110 114% 144 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 113 113 109 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 350 Write 132 Mixed 175 SusWrite 110 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 30.5 109% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 140 108% 149 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$33 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 510GB free Firmware: AP63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 117 116 121 120 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 104 Write 112 Mixed 59.7 SusWrite 117 72% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 65GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 91 92 93 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 112 Write 83 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 93.5 67% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 192GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 123 124 121 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 118 Write 109 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 122 67% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 107%
ST332062 0AS 320GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 75GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 56.5 Write 55.3 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 75.3 77% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB 31,969 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 11.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,394x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	689x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	333x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	285x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	282x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	274x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	131x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	123x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	122x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	367x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	156x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $482

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)