Asrock B365M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 12:29
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 634
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.1% Very good
Lighting 98.3
Reflection 106
Parallax 163
80% 122 fps
MRender 89.5
Gravity 102
Splatting 75.1
71% 88.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 350
Mixed 225
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 13.9
59% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 40.7
46% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: CV12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 176
Mixed 76.9
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
77GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.4
Write 99.5
Mixed 68.9
66% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FBD2 Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 21.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback