Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 24.5 1-Core 25.5 2-Core 50.7 20% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 91.7 8-Core 103 13% 97.3 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1226) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.35% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 2.2 2% 1.83 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 0.2 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.35% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GB 992 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0S03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 337 418 293 258 252 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 556 Write 499 Mixed 529 SusWrite 340 108% 481 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 38.7 110% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 200 159% 222 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 216%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR32D4S2S1KC-4 2x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 7.1 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 2.6 6% 1.97 GB/s	Latency 289 14% 289 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	155x
Pentium Silver J5040IntelBench 41%, 500 samples	115x
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	57x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	225x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	159x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	90x
OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GBKingstonBench 146%, 992 samples	24x
MZVLQ256HAJD-000AC 256GBSamsungBench 125%, 225 samples	12x

RAM
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GBSK_HynixBench 27%, 94 samples	51x
ACR32D4S2S1KC-4 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 85 samples	44x
HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 2x4GBSK_HynixBench 25%, 50 samples	43x