Asrock P67 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock P67 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 17:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 227
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 328
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 112
Parallax 104
91% 109 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 107
Splatting 103
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 328 174 186 161 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 315
Write 352
Mixed 322
SusWrite 218
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 39.8
131% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 158
174% 293 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme6 - $202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback