Asus P8Z68-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LX  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '17 at 09:08
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 457
61% 454 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.7% Good
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 63.2
62% 71.7 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 69.5
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 191
Write 83.6
Mixed 114
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 7.64
71% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 29.2
31% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 61%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
42GB free
Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 173
Write 112
Mixed 116
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 11.6
100% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 24.5
41% 79 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
346GB free
Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 106
Write 109
Mixed 107
81% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.47
104% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
1TB free, PID 61b7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 84.9
Write 106
Mixed 60.1
108% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 5.81
4K Mixed 0.39
214% 2.32 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
ST932032 5AS 320GB
75GB free, PID 201d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.1% Poor
Read 34.4
Write 55.7
Mixed 38.1
58% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.29
43% 0.51 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LX Builds (Compare 1,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback