Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '23 at 16:39
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 254 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 157 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 424 44% 353 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 11.3 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 10.9 9% 7.63 fps	MRender 58.1 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.7 14% 19.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB 1,321 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 410 407 412 414 203 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 440 Write 310 Mixed 274 SusWrite 374 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 26.5 97% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 195 162% 227 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 316%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 466GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 435 433 428 438 440 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 443 Write 404 Mixed 420 SusWrite 433 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 45.8 156% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 292 238% 340 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 465GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 352 350 354 355 357 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 343 Write 343 Mixed 318 SusWrite 353 77% 339 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 35.3 116% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 196 148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 09F7 DDR4 PC 8G 2400 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2460, 2460 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 23 78% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 20.7 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	21x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	12x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	12x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $129Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	15x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	9x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $937

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16