Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161130
Uptime	8.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '23 at 05:47
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 106 2-Core 201 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 569 57% 465 Pts	64-Core 523 32% 523 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 150 Parallax 151 126% 152 fps	MRender 159 Gravity 129 Splatting 114 108% 134 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 920 782 795 799 789 796 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 1,875 Write 1,716 Mixed 1,440 SusWrite 813 327% 1,461 MB/s	4K Read 50.7 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 70.5 236% 83.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,106 DQ Write 884 DQ Mixed 889 694% 959 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 232GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 306 306 305 306 305 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 421 Write 407 Mixed 352 SusWrite 312 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 48 157% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 357 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 132 134 134 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 90.2 Write 129 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 134 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 4x8GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.8% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 20 64% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 19.1 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	25x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $383

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16