PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Acer Aspire M5910 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Aspire M5910 |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100517 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 09 '23 at 19:06 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 59% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
INTENSO 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0312A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 15 17 15 MB/s
|
22%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
148GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 119 121 121 MB/s
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
40.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 68x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 59x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 33x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 12x |
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples | 9x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 9x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 11x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 9x |
X150 480GBEmtecBench 75%, 1,954 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $301 |