Medion MD35239

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD35239  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration377 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 734
72% 590 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Zotac(19DA 9538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.7% Good
Lighting 87.1
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 80.7
71% 84.7 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 68.4
67% 84.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E12S-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27B 512GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1319 549 550 557 489 553 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1354
Write 2,160
Mixed 1,401
SusWrite 669
316% 1,396 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 63.2
205% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 601
DQ Write 494
DQ Mixed 597
434% 564 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 184%
Great: 204%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
352GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 26 47 10 168 172 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 99%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
773GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 615 541 507 509 507 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 13 3.3 12 14 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Read 12.9
Write 20.4
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 8.2
15% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
42% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4BU008G-3200XG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 22.8
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 23.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD35239 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Medion MD35239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback