Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 398 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 57.7 2-Core 115 53% 84.1 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 534 44% 382 Pts	64-Core 1,705 106% 1,705 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.5 Reflection 17.6 Parallax 20.2 18% 19.8 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 22.5 Splatting 16.2 17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB 495 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 125 124 132 114 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 449 Write 383 Mixed 321 SusWrite 142 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 8.6 57% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 84.2 DQ Mixed 36.5 45% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 16x16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 16 of 16 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	MC Read 49.2 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 39.5 117% 40.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	6x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 52 samples	6x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	3x
M393B2G70QH0- 16x16GBSamsungBench 99%, 14 samples	3x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16