MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7976
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161214
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '17 at 04:50
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 275
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 756
77% 622 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2624 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.2% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 152
Parallax 27.3
108% 104 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 113
64% 74.8 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 Series 250GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 500
Mixed 503
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 46.7
196% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 47
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 32.7
67% 128 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
150GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 416
Mixed 416
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 43
184% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 117
135% 232 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
51GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
Read 413
Write 84.2
Mixed 160
47% 219 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 13.5
66% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 29.5
DQ Mixed 26.5
49% 105 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
500GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 131
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.28
91% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 26.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 28
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) Builds (Compare 2,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 (MS-7976) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback